Ok, I'm officially old. I am boggling over a resume that claims, among other things to be proficient at Twitter.
Twitter.
How exactly is one proficient at Twitter? You can successfully type words? Maybe throw in a "without offending lots of people"? How did this get to be a job qualification?
Do you also have a really sweet MySpace page? Maybe you're the mayor of our museum in FourSquare.
Get off my lawn.
Twitter.
How exactly is one proficient at Twitter? You can successfully type words? Maybe throw in a "without offending lots of people"? How did this get to be a job qualification?
Do you also have a really sweet MySpace page? Maybe you're the mayor of our museum in FourSquare.
Get off my lawn.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 05:14 pm (UTC)From:Yes, Twitter is vapid a lot of the time. And, like all networking sites, it's rampant with ad-stream Twitter accounts. But I also remember things like the unfolding of support for the dissidents in the Iranian elections, the way people responded to the crisis in Haiti, and I can see the potential for Twitter to be both useful and purposeful. As ever, these things are only so deep as we make them.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 06:17 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 09:37 pm (UTC)From:As @TrinVix says below, it gets a lot of usage in marketing these days, and has actually been seeing a lot of use in B2B channels, which is sort of fascinating to me. It more or less approximates an RSS feed for some purposes, I suppose. Companies releasing many short communications to their dedicated fan base appear more 'human' as well as get some incredibly targeted messages out to precisely the audience that would buy in.
As for the original topic, given how Web 2.0 is bandied about everywhere these days, listing comfort with social media in general seems like a fine thing for a somewhat techie person to list on a resume just because it means they're cued into tech trends. Twitter specifically? Still dumb.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-31 03:56 pm (UTC)From: